Tuesday, February 9, 2010

If president Ma can force ECFA down our throats and Taiwanese have absolutely no say
Why can anyone call Taiwan democratic (民主)?

If president Ma can force ECFA down our throats and Taiwanese have absolutely no say, then by definition, Ma is a dictator, and Taiwan is under a dictatorship.

Everyday goes by sees Ma do tremendous damage to Taiwan. To me, he is on a mission to destroy Taiwan and he won't step down by himself. I would recommend that DPP talks to KMT legislators to see whether an alliance can be formed to start a congressional recall of Ma. Meanwhile, Taiwanese must speak up loudly to demand
  • Their constitutional birthrights of referendum, and
  • Unobstructed legislative oversight
2010-02-09-頭家來開講-4


Saturday, February 6, 2010

金溥聰: 立委補選要打
中國
國民黨 的形象牌 II

Put 金溥聰: 立委補選要打中國國民黨 的形象牌 and this headline news:立委補選 中國國民黨拚過半 together. The two just do not go together, considering the fact that
  • 中國國民黨 has a 形象牌 that is surely going to attract voters, and
  • out of the four polling areas, three (桃園、新竹、花蓮) are 中國國民黨's strongholds and, according to fabricated polls, 中國國民黨 is also gaining grounds in 嘉義.
If 中國國民黨 is going to be believed, then the headline news should read: 中國國民黨 will sweep the 227 立委補選! That is a cinch for KMT/CCP media. They have been doing that since they started their existence.


立委補選 國民黨拚過半

聯合新聞網 - ‎5小時之前‎
四席立委補選進入關鍵衝刺期,國民黨提前推出主席牌強勢輔選,但黨內最新民調,目前桃園縣、西竹縣、嘉義縣均陷入苦戰,花蓮縣雖領先,雙方差距持續縮小,讓黨內高層膽戰心驚。 距離月底投票剩不到三周,馬英九已跑遍桃竹嘉花四縣,預定下周春節期間,還會四縣跑透透;黨 ...
NOWnews - 自由時報

Friday, February 5, 2010

金溥聰: 立委補選要打
中國
國民黨 的形象牌

金溥聰 must tell us what 中國國民黨 的形象牌 is. To me, 中國國民黨 的形象 is 228 massacre, white terror, owning the judicial system to persecute opposition and protect its own (think Chen Shui-Bian, Ma Ying-Jeou and Diane Lee), military, media, and the world-largest ill-gotten party asset. All these pale when compared with what Ma is trying to accomplish now: to turn Taiwan into Tibet.

An aside is a fabricated poll:
目前民調數字,藍營的林德瑞29%、綠營的陳明文43%
The actual vote will show a single digit support for 林德瑞!

Unless voters desire to be brainwashed and enslaved forever by KMT/CCP, please come out on 227 to shout NO to 中國國民黨.

中時電子報 - ‎2010年2月1日‎:: 未來事件交易所:四席立委補選 中國國民黨全敗
2010/01/30 新台灣論壇: 未交所預測 227綠4席都贏

嘉縣立委之戰 金溥聰:把不可能變可能 【12:05】

〔中央社〕對桃園縣等4席立委補選,國民黨主席牌將在春節期間強力輔選。國民黨秘書長金溥聰說,待調整好體力,嘉義縣之戰,「我要從『不可能』變成『可能』的戰爭」。

桃園縣第3選區、新竹縣、嘉義縣第2選區、花蓮縣4席立委補選2月27日投票。最近身體微恙的金溥聰要趁這兩天休養生息,調整體力拚選舉。國民黨主席馬英九小年夜將至新竹縣圍爐,大年初二開始會密集輔選。

對年底 5都直轄市長選舉,金溥聰表示,國民黨不管對手怎麼做,自己正努力思考如何推出最強的候選人,「協調已經鴨子划水在進行」。

他說,黨中央目前已徵詢那些表達參選意願的人選,提名方式將採「因地制宜」原則,以協調為優先,「希望不要走到初選這一步,以免同志間製造對立氣氛」。

對目前 4縣立委補選選情分析,金溥聰指出,根據內部民調,桃園縣的國民黨參選人陳學聖落後綠軍的幅度「在誤差範圍內」。但他認為,陳學聖形象好,本身又有極高昂的戰鬥意志,交戰中的選情會漸入佳境。

新竹縣到目前為止,還有 4成未表態,國民黨參選人鄭永堂落後對手約10%。金溥聰表示,馬英九在小年夜將赴新竹縣長邱鏡淳公館,與前新竹縣長鄭永金、鄭永堂,以及新竹縣議會議長張碧琴「圍爐」,希望大家放下過去恩怨。

他說,新竹縣基本盤勢藍大於綠,現在的落後主因是藍軍分裂,如能真心團結,「勝選希望濃厚」。

對嘉義縣選情,金溥聰神情相當愉悅,「林德瑞趕上來的速度比預期還快」。目前民調數字,藍營的林德瑞29%、綠營的陳明文43%,「如果未來 1週林德瑞能衝上3成,陳明文掉到4成以下」,「這場仗就有一拚的可能性」。

金溥聰說,「我要從『不可能』變成『可能』的戰爭」。

花蓮縣部分,國民黨參選人王廷升領先綠軍蕭美琴的幅度大於誤差範圍;不過,金溥聰相當謹慎。「我們領先幅度縮小了」,藍大於綠的優勢在花蓮縣已不那麼穩固。

分析王廷升領先縮小的原因,金溥聰認為是無黨籍參選人施勝郎在現任花蓮縣長傅崑萁的表態相挺下,民調數字明顯升高。

他表示,這場立委補選的戰爭是要打中國國民黨的形象牌,「盡力做到自己最大能力的表現」。

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Breaking News:
中國國民黨立委候選人林德瑞
要求與民進黨 ECFA辯論

Read 馬英九/林德瑞: incoherent Harvard and BYU graduates to see how incoherent 林德瑞 could be, even though he was a BYU Ph.D. and a 國立中正大學/財經法律學系 系所主任.

No one can know what ECFA is because ECFA detail has never been disclosed. 馬英九 提出願意就ECFA議題與民進黨進行辯論 (See: 辯論ECFA 馬說假的). But he continues to have zero communication with people in general and DPP in particular. His premier Wu refused invitation from university students to debate students on ECFA (see 大學生邀辯ECFA 吳敦義沒空). Dr. Jerome Keating reported that NO government officers showed up in a huge event organized by Taiwan-centered organizations for a ECFA debate on 2009-01-23 in front of the Presidential Palace, . (see ECFA: Darkest transparency).

Now, 林德瑞 challenged 民進黨 for an ECFA debate! I recommend that Taiwanese take up 林德瑞's offer:
  • 民進黨 or other Taiwan-centered organizations should arrange ECFA debates with 林德瑞 and other 中國國民黨立委候選人 such as 王廷升. Record the events and upload to youTube for permanent archive.
  • 中正大學 and 東華大學's students, faculty and staff should visit with 林德瑞 and 王廷升 to seek enlightenment on ECFA. Personally, I would like them to explain the secrecy of ECFA and MOU, and whether they support 中國國民黨's stripping away people's right of referendum.

自由時報: 立委補選 ECFA議題 藍綠陣營各自表述
陳明文下鄉座談,提到反對簽署ECFA,以保護台灣。 (記者王善嬿攝)
中國國民黨候選人林德瑞,拜票也把握機會推銷ECFA。 (記者王善嬿攝)

候選人提議開政策辯論會

〔記者王善嬿/嘉義報導〕嘉縣立委補選,民進黨與國民黨陣營近日勤辦說明會,其中說明會上最「夯」議題當屬ECFA,雙邊各自表述,爭取選民認同,候選人更提議召開政策辯論會。

嘉縣立委補選,國、民兩黨參選人不約而同選擇以說明會方式,到10個鄉鎮與民座談,向基層扎根,其中最熱門的議題就是ECFA,然而雙方你來我往、各自表述,聽得選民「霧煞煞」。

陳明文:保護台灣反對簽署

民 進黨參選人陳明文陣營就指出,馬政府若簽署ECFA,會為台灣本土農業帶來重大衝擊,雖然現在說不進口中國農產品,然而馬政府屈服美方壓力,進口可能危及 國人健康的美國牛肉,讓台灣人難以相信,兩岸簽署ECFA後,馬政府傾中跟自我矮化的姿態,無法抵擋中國農產品進口的壓力,因此反對簽署ECFA,一定要 保台灣、保嘉義。

林德瑞:簽署可化解邊緣化

國民黨參選人林德瑞陣營則表示,區域經濟整合是各國間趨勢,簽署ECFA,可擴大兩岸貿易及投資,解決台灣經濟被邊緣化的危機。

兩方人馬針對ECFA激辯,然而仍有8成民眾還是不了解ECFA,林德瑞昨天遂向對手陳明文喊話,要求與他及民進黨針對簽署ECFA做政策辯論;陳明文陣營則回應,國民黨是執政黨,民眾對ECFA的疑慮,應該由政府說清楚。

ECFA: Darkest transparency

Dr. Jerome Keating's eyewitness report of the darkest transparency of ECFA, while it being touted [read: 指鹿為馬] as transparent. Governemnt officers including President Ma and Premier Wu were invited to explain ECFA to the public. None came, as expected. See also

辯論ECFA 馬說假的 III
北社再三邀請 馬英九 吳敦義 顏清標
參與 說明 辯論

Dr. Jerome Keating: Taiwan's Great ECFA Debate that Never Was and Probably Never Will Be

Tuesday January 26

Ma Ying-jeou has been president of Taiwan for almost two years and Taiwan's economy still flounders. Like a one-trick pony, Ma seems only capable of playing the run-to-China card, but so far his panda and tourist gambits and direct flights have done nothing. His advisors have no other pro-offered plans or proposals. So as desperation mounts for the past year he has been touting an unknown economic framework agreement (ECFA) with China. Despite previous failed experiments, this will be Taiwan's salvation. That is great but despite his claims of transparency and openness, no one still knows what Ma's ECFA will entail. Not to worry, says Ma, just give me a blank check and I will take care of everything. That of course is what a growing number of Taiwanese fear, i.e. that Ma will take care of everything so that there will be no Taiwan left.

In accord with this, another of many protests was launched on this past January 23rd to try and get some answer. In that protest numerous Taiwanese groups invited Ma, Premier Wu Den-yih, and/or Minister of Economic Affairs Shih Mao-lin to an open debate on the pros and cons of ECFA. If it is going to be the salvation of Taiwan and people are being asked to give Ma a blank check on it, the people of Taiwan deserve some explanation of what is the cost of this alleged salvation. Just what is the blank check going to buy? And what amount (what cost) is going to be put on the blank check?

Of course no one from the Ma government showed up. Like many other Ma programs, this makes people wonder, is the Ma government flying by the seat of its pants as it goes into secret discussions with China? Have secret deals been worked out beforehand, just like the recent beef import scandal with the USA? Who knows? Will people only find out the truth when it is too late? For photos of the protest, go to the left and click on the side bar listing of "Protest" and then click on that for January 23.

Saturday, January 23, 2010

Ma Ying-Jeou's Taipei Times Interview:
I will force Taiwan's Tibetization
There is nothing Taiwanese can do about it

A transcript of the interview is here: ECFA will help Taiwan catch up with Asia: Ma

2010-01-21-頭家來開講-5 shows just how openly Ma can lie. It is as if he said to the interviewers during the interview: I am not doing an interview!
President Ma Ying-jeou spoke with ‘Taipei Times’ reporters in an interview at the Presidential Office on Thursday, expounding on his government’s plan to sign an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China. He tried to allay public qualms over the proposed pact, while emphasizing that an ECFA would be a crucial lever that would allow Taiwan to sign free-trade agreements with other countries
Some comments about the interview:
  • He again reiterated that Taiwanese will not be allowed to use referendum to decide ECFA
  • Ma was evasive and Ma was stonewalling, for example:
    Taipei Times(TT): Mr. President, you just mentioned that signing an ECFA is just the beginning. Can you tell us exactly where it will eventually lead Taiwan? ...

    Ma: First, we have to ask ourselves this question: Can we afford not to sign an ECFA? Ten years ago, there were only three FTAs [free-trade agreements] in Asia, but the number jumped to 58 last year. The only two countries in Asia that do not have FTAs [with other Asian nations] are Taiwan and North Korea.

    Taiwan has signed FTAs with five of its diplomatic allies in Central America. Although they have increased bilateral trade, the amount of the increase has been small.

    So when we sign FTAs, we can do it with our major trading partners, such as mainland China, Japan, the US, ASEAN countries, the European Union, South Korea and Singapore.

    However, we have encountered various obstacles over the past years. We launched FTA negotiations with Singapore about 10 years ago, but many factors made the attempt unsuccessful.
    He did not answer the question. So the reporters came back after a while:
    TT: So that brings us back to our original question. Exactly where will the ECFA lead Taiwan, if it’s just the beginning?

    Ma: First, it will help us catch up with the pace of economic integration in the region. There are 58 FTAs in Asia, but Taiwan has none. We have FTAs with our diplomatic allies in Central America, but we must remove the obstacles and sign more with other countries. The solution is to sign an ECFA with Beijing.

    Cross-strait trade in 2008 exceeded US$130 billion, but there was no mechanism in place to institutionalize the trade. If there is such a mechanism, it will not only reduce obstructions to our effort to sign FTAs with other countries, but also increase the ratio of our products in the Chinese market.

    An ECFA is conducive to Taiwan, but some local businesses will pay a price at the same time. We have conducted studies on the issue and held countless meetings to integrate opinions.

    But it seems all of your questions presume that signing an ECFA will be negative to Taiwan. Do you think it’s better not to sign it?
    Ma would not answer the question where will ECFA eventually lead Taiwan? He would not say I will turn Taiwan into Tibet. He would not say I refuse to answer your question. He chose to say something without answering.
    TT: But Mr. President, you still did not answer our question: Where will the ECFA lead? Will the two sides [of the Taiwan Strait] eventually become a free-trade area or form a customs union?

    Ma: Basically, the tariffs will be lower under an ECFA. A customs union is unlikely because both sides will have uniform tariffs. That will be impossible.
    I pray that Taiwanese will dump Ma (if he is still around) and choose a president in 2012 who can be forthright. Fortunately, the Taipei Times reporters were persistent:
    TT: So it will eventually be a free-trade area?

    Ma: Something similar to a free-trade area, and that is in the spirit of the WTO. But I want to emphasize the WTO does not require any member to open its labor market and there are grace periods for the opening the market to some businesses.
    This is too much for me.
  • Can you believe that Ma did not say China even once during the interview? He either said Mainland China or Mainland, but not China. To me, when someone uses Mainland to refer to China, the person is either China-centered, or is deeply brainwashed. Why, to a Taiwanese, mainland should be the island of Taiwan! I find Ma's use of Mainland China or Mainland objectionable because they are not country names. People don't say Mainland America or Mainland to refer to USA.

中國國民黨及中國共產黨: 台灣民主進步黨是暴力黨
中國國民黨及中國共產黨: 蔡英文是超級暴力小英
KMT/CCP rape people, but complain people fight back

Who is more violent? KMT/CCP or 蔡英文 or 劉曉波? Just consider this:
CCP allows no elections whatsoever, and KMT disallows referendums because of their organized violence against people. Both KMT and CCP use their control of media to brainwash people about referendum being unnecessary when the fact is that referendum is as natural as breathing in a country like USA. Both KMT and CCP have complete control of the judicial system to protect their own and persecute oppositions. Most absurdly, displaying national flag in Taiwan was met with police violence during Chinese envoy Chen's visit and when two Chinese pandas arrived at Taipei.

Two asides:
  • This 中國國民黨廣告 is of such extreme low quality, it makes you shudder at the competence of 中國國民黨
  • The idea that this ad will convince Taiwanese that 台灣民主進步黨是暴力黨 or 蔡英文是超級暴力小英 is an extreme contempt of the Taiwanese' intelligence. The logic is perhaps this: didn't 7,659,014 (against Hsieh's 5,444,949) vote for Ma no matter how absurd Ma was? Ergo, Taiwanese will eat anything we KMT feed them.

2010-01-23 1 of 13 新台灣加油

2010-01-19: 謝志偉專訪立委蔡同榮

2010-01-22-頭家來開講-4